Health & Fitness

Body Fat Calculator

Estimate body fat from height and circumference measurements using the US Navy equation. This can help you understand a measurement-based estimate, but a tape measure cannot directly separate fat, muscle, bone and water.

01

Your inputs

02

Your result

Ready when you are.

Adjust the inputs, then calculate to see your result here.

Calculated on your device. Inputs are not saved by this calculator.

GET MORE FROM YOUR RESULT

Using the Body Fat Calculator

Enter every measurement in centimeters, even though the equation converts them to inches internally. The female equation uses hip circumference as well as waist and neck; the male equation does not use the hip entry. Small differences in tape placement can noticeably change the answer.

Worked example

Use the example inputs below to reproduce this result. These are the form's starting values, not recommended targets. Changing your inputs updates your result above; this worked example stays fixed for comparison. Results are rounded for display.

Example inputs

Sex used by the equation
Male
Height (cm)
175
Waist / abdomen (cm)
85
Neck (cm)
38
Hips (cm; female equation only)
95

Example result

Estimated body fat (%)
17.007719

Method and assumptions

US Navy circumference equation, converting centimeters to inches. An adult population estimate, not a body-composition measurement or an official service assessment.

Reference: calculator.net — method and further reading

Make repeated measurements comparable

A measurement-based estimate can change because the body changed or because the measurement technique changed. Keep the location, units and method consistent when comparing records. The result cannot identify which explanation applies. A ratio or predicted percentage describes only the measurements used by that equation, not a complete assessment of health or fitness.

Common question

Is this the same as a body-composition scan?

No. The calculator predicts a percentage from body dimensions. It does not measure tissue directly, and different assessment methods can produce different estimates for the same person. Avoid treating the decimal places as evidence of clinical precision.